In Sandifer v. United States Steel Corp. the Seventh Circuit considered claims brought by 800 former and current unionized hourly workers at U.S. Steel’s Gary, Indiana steel works facility under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) that they should have been compensated for time spent: (1) putting on clothing-items consisting of flame-retardant pants and jacket, work gloves, boots containing steel or other material to protect the toes and instep, a hard hat, safety glasses, ear plugs, and a “snood” (a hood covering the top of the head, the chin and the neck); and (2) walking from the locker room and work site. The court ruled that neither act could support an FLSA claim and ordered the suit be dismissed in its entirety.Continue reading this entry
Tag Archives: “On The Clock”
Subscribe to This Blog
Topics
- Affirmative Action Compliance
- Americans With Disabilities Act
- Discipline and Termination
- Discrimination, Retaliation and Harassment
- E-Discovery
- EEOC Developments
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Human Resources/ Employer Matters
- Immigration, Nationality & Consular Law
- Labor Relations
- New and Recent Legislation
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
- Trade Secrets Protection/Noncompetes
- Uncategorized
- Uniformed Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Wage and Hour
- Web Conferences
Recent Updates
- “They Owe You” Does Not Always Mean You Can Withhold
- D.C. Circuit Tells NLRB “No Workplace Poster for You!”
- NLRB Continues to Get in Your Face-book
- The Union Is Knocking at My Door: What Can I Say?
- NLRB Issues New Guidance Advice on Confidentiality Prohibiting Discussions of Workplace Investigations