The DOJ’s Antitrust Scrutiny is Here to Stay

antitrust

Over the past couple of years, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has stepped up antitrust enforcement against companies for entering “no-poach” agreements. These “no-poach” or “no-hire” agreements are arrangements entered into between companies that would otherwise compete for the same employees, whereby each company agrees not to recruit/solicit or hire the other’s employees.

Continue reading this entry

DOL Issues New FMLA, FLSA Guidance to Employers

DOL

Last week, the Department of Labor (DOL) Wage and Hour Division (WHD) issued its first three opinion letters of 2019 concerning the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). These opinion letters are a helpful tool for employers to understand their rights and responsibilities under the law. Employers may even rely upon DOL opinion letters as a good faith defense to wage claims arising under the FLSA. Accordingly, paying close attention to the latest guidance the WHD has to offer is an easy way to limit risks and reduce potential liabilities.

Continue reading this entry

Employers’ Diversity Data and Initiatives: Trade Secret or Open Book?

diversity

As many companies prepare to submit their annual “EEO-1” reports to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission revealing their workforce statistics by race and gender for their U.S.-based employees by EEO job category, they face the increasing possibility that this information will become public. The decision last week by a federal district court vacating the administrative stay of a revision the EEOC proposed back in 2016, requiring employers to include compensation data by race and gender on a revised EEO-1 report, ups the ante further. Many companies consider such demographic data to be confidential. This raises the question whether a company’s diversity strategy—and its data reflecting success (or not) in implementing that strategy—qualify for protection under federal and state trade secret laws.

Continue reading this entry

Summary Plan Descriptions: You Gotta Have Them, So Make the Most of Them

summary

Administrators of plans subject to ERISA (including plans sponsored by for-profit and nonprofit businesses and organizations[1]) must provide participants and beneficiaries with summary plan descriptions (“SPDs”) describing “the most important facts they need to know about their retirement and health benefit plans including plan rules, financial information, and documents on the operation and management of the plan.” ERISA mandates how plan administrators should present those facts and when to provide the SPD.

Continue reading this entry

DOL Issues Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Increase Salary Thresholds

Proposed

On March 7, 2019, the Department of Labor (DOL) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that would increase the minimum salaried basis threshold required to be paid to employees under the white collar exemptions (e.g., executive, administrative, and professional).

Under current regulations, to avoid paying overtime, employers must pay employees at least $455/week ($23,660/year) and establish that the employee meets the duties tests of the specific exemption. The DOL established the current salary threshold in 2004. The DOL attempted to increase the salaried basis threshold to $913/week ($47,476/year) in 2016. However, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas declared that rule invalid. The DOL appealed that ruling, but the appeal was being held in abeyance, meaning that the appeal has been temporarily suspended so that the DOL could determine an appropriate new salary threshold.

In the March 7, 2019 NPRM, the DOL proposes to rescind the 2016 increase and replace it with a new rule that accounts for a “minimum weekly salary level to reflect growth in wages and salaries and allow the inclusion of certain nondiscretionary bonuses and incentive payments to count towards up to 10 percent of the standard salary level.” In developing this proposal, the DOL considered the more than 200,000 comments it has received both as part of a 2017 Request for Information and during its six in-person listening tours.

The DOL proposes that the new threshold be established under the same basis as the 2004 salary level. Specifically, the 2004 final rule set the standard salary level at approximately the 20th percentile of earnings of full-time salaried workers in the lowest-wage census region (then and now the South) and in the retail sector. Using this same methodology and projected to January 2020, the current salary threshold would be $679/week ($35,308/year). Additionally, the DOL NPRM would allow employers to count 10% of incentive compensation/bonuses toward the salaried basis threshold.

Further, the DOL seeks to increase the Highly Compensated Employee (HCE) test, which pairs a reduced duties requirement with a higher compensation level (currently $100,000). The DOL uses the same methodology used in the 2016 final rule for the HCE test: the 90th percentile of full-time salaried workers nationally, again projected forward to 2020 (which will be $147,414/year).

Comments are due by the sixtieth day following publication of the NPRM in the Federal Register.

Employers should remember that both California and New York already impose higher salary thresholds to meet their state law exemptions. Employers should also watch for an increase in Washington state within the next thirty days (expected to be on a multiple of minimum wage) and keep an eye on Pennsylvania which is also considering legislation to raise the salary threshold.