As announced by the White House this week, President Obama directed the Department of Labor to update the regulations on the white-collar exemptions. Specifically, the President instructed the Secretary of Labor Thomas Perez to update the regulations. The President’s point was that the minimum salary requirements had only been raised once since 1975, and that was in 2004 when the minimum weekly salary was raised from $250 to $455. The directive did not provide any details on what changes would be made. However, the one page memo said that the regulations have not kept up with the modern economy and that millions of workers therefore lack overtime protections.
This memorandum specifically targets both the amount of compensation paid to the lowest level of exempt employees and the specifics of what constitutes an exempt employee. While no guidance has been provided as to what President Obama meant, the tone and tenure suggest a plan to further narrow the exemption, therefore, expanding the number of employees entitled to overtime. This agenda fits within the President’s plan to increase the minimum wage to $10.10 per hour in the private sector.
Any regulations promulgated by the DOL will have to be published for review and comment before they are implemented. Any expansion of workers who will no longer be considered exempt will likely be hotly contested by employers. Industries that will most likely be affected are retail and hospitality because they often employ managers and supervisors at the lowest levels of compensation.
Interestingly, one thing that both employee groups and employer groups have in common is the belief that the Fair Labor Standards Act has not kept up with the modern world. However, it is unlikely that any DOL proposed regulations will do much to aid employers in fitting that proverbial square peg in the round hole – when it comes to things like travel time, use of technology, etc.
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney.
This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary.
The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites.
In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.