The Fifth Circuit recently decided how much a restaurant employer could deduct from an employee’s tips received by credit card to offset the costs associated with collecting and distributing the tips. In Steele v. Leasing Enterprises, Limited, the Fifth Circuit concluded the employer can only deduct the direct costs associated with paying out the tips. Because the restaurant deducted more than the fees and costs relating to the credit transactions, it lost the benefit of the statutory tip credit. All restaurant employers should take notice of this expensive lesson.
A class of servers sued Leasing Enterprises, Limited, which operates the Perry’s restaurant chain in Texas, for deducting 3.25% of the tips customers leave for them via credit card. Perry’s conceded that the chargeback exceeded the fees charged by the credit card issuer, but contended that the expenses related to obtaining the cash to pay out the servers were also properly deducted from the tips. Specifically, Perry’s explained that because the servers wanted to be paid out daily in cash rather than having their tips be included in their regular paychecks, it was required to have an armored truck deliver cash to the restaurants three times per week. This additional cost was included in the deduction from the servers’ tip amounts.
The Fifth Circuit held that it was lawful to deduct the cost of fees charged by the credit card issuer from the tips, but it was improper to deduct other expenses relating to the tip payments. The court noted that the decision to hire an armored truck for frequent cash deliveries was a business decision relating to employee satisfaction, not a fee attributable to dealing with the credit card companies. As a result of the overcharge, Perry’s lost the benefit of the statutory tip credit for the class of employees for the relevant time period.
Ensuring compliance with the Fair Labor Standards Act has always been complicated for restaurants with tipped employees; this decision adds another factor restaurants must be aware of to ensure the statutory tip credit is not inadvertently forfeited.
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney.
This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary.
The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites.
In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.